<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google launches Creative Commons filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frenden.com/google-launches-creative-commons-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frenden.com/google-launches-creative-commons-filtering/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-launches-creative-commons-filtering</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Ray Frenden, an illustrator.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:53:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/google-launches-creative-commons-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=273#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>As an illustrator you shouldn&#039;t rely on selling content. It&#039;s an internet era and just like most programmers, actors, etc. the best (safe) way to ern a living is selling it as a service, not as a product.
Content is dead, long live content!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an illustrator you shouldn&#8217;t rely on selling content. It&#8217;s an internet era and just like most programmers, actors, etc. the best (safe) way to ern a living is selling it as a service, not as a product.<br />
Content is dead, long live content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Frenden</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/google-launches-creative-commons-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Frenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=273#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Gimping your image uploads with giant watermarks or low resolution is probably going to be a greater detriment to future business than possible misuse.

It&#039;s interesting to see how copyright is changing. Fun times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimping your image uploads with giant watermarks or low resolution is probably going to be a greater detriment to future business than possible misuse.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see how copyright is changing. Fun times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esben Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/google-launches-creative-commons-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Esben Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=273#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>The concern is well founded and it will without a doubt come up with cases of misuse, intended or not. 

The real question for illustrators and photographers alike, is uploading copyrighted material, for the potential gain to attract business. I think this is the most important issue to tackle and should be done on a individual level (until a really good idea arrives). For instance in your case it could be that you uploaded illustrations in a lower quality, low image size or avoiding full images and just show portions of it; well even taking a photo after printing it on tees or posters.

Personally I see Googles initiative as a bit boring one, since there are two exceptional good engines/sources to get CC images (wikipedia &amp; flickr).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concern is well founded and it will without a doubt come up with cases of misuse, intended or not. </p>
<p>The real question for illustrators and photographers alike, is uploading copyrighted material, for the potential gain to attract business. I think this is the most important issue to tackle and should be done on a individual level (until a really good idea arrives). For instance in your case it could be that you uploaded illustrations in a lower quality, low image size or avoiding full images and just show portions of it; well even taking a photo after printing it on tees or posters.</p>
<p>Personally I see Googles initiative as a bit boring one, since there are two exceptional good engines/sources to get CC images (wikipedia &amp; flickr).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

