Fuck Cameesa
I don’t know about you, but I’m having a hard enough time making a living from illustration in the current economy. The ever growing list of crowdsourcing, spec-generating sites like 99Designs has added another to its tally, Cameesa. This is a particularly hard pill to swallow. Cameesa’s crowd-funding philosophy was almost an ubuntu-esque, anti-spec treatise. Enter “Operations.” “Operations” on Cameesa let entities create requests for designs. From their own copy:
How it works? … Artists submit their Ragnarok Tee designs. … Members financially support an unlimited number of their favorite designs with $10+shipping. … Artists & Supporters are rewarded with ongoing dividends and t-shirts (once a designs hits $500). Read the full details OR Start supporting.
Screenshots from the current system:
Most designers are not picked and spend many hours working for the entity’s “theme” for free. They end up with designs for a specific entity that are not applicable for resale in most cases. This is much different than creating personal works that can be used elsewhere should the designs not be chosen for print. How likely is it that a Ragnarok games based design will be usable for another purpose? I have similar issues with Design By Humans’ “themed” contests that often require work to be created on spec for large clients. Incubus and KISS, really? Good luck selling the Gene Simmons design elsewhere! I’m sure you won’t be sued into oblivion; perhaps that’s the final fuck you to the designers leasing their souls one entry at a time?
I tweeted a succinct, if vulgar, summary of my feelings on Cameesa’s “Operations” program and received a reply from Andrew Cronk, who created a thread on Cameesa to address possible concerns. Let Cameesa know how you feel there.
Designers lose, entities win. Spec-alike, for sure. Crowdfunded? More like crowdsourced!
Update: The Design By Humans art director responded to my comment with a less than satisfying rebuttal. Ho-hum.



Jul 8th, 2009 #
go get ‘em.or better yet, jst fuck ‘em and let them fail in their own horrible idea. thanks for warning others though.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
I try to remain calm and professional. Sometimes calm and professional doesn’t make an impact.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
I support what you are doing to defend and educate artist.
Both clients and designers need to have mutual respect for a job to go well. This is just absurd. Only in the art world would it be ok to pull of a trick like spec.
Thank you for giving it a voice Ray.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
A lot of illustration sites shy away from having a healthy debate about spec-work as if sticking your head in the sand will make it go away.
It’s killing our industry. We have to be passionate and focused against it.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
With the death of print and the rise of crowdsourcing, illustration as a career path has nearly been obviated.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
well, this is why (like you said about DBH) i don’t like the theme contests so much anymore. many do not give enough time, and are so specific you can never really use them again. i understand from their point of view they are giving something of interest every week, but to artists, it’s really a waste of time.
this issue you are after though, is far worse and thoughtless on their part.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
The parallels are pretty clear. Spec and themed contests are kissing cousins. Both devalue the industry without doubt.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
99designs is the fricken worst. people are cheap and lazy and they don’t realize what they’re getting is shit
cameesa should take one from threadless and their themed contests. it generates more traffic and interest without crowdsourcing. of course they’re themes are a lot more general and don’t have a specific client like Lil Wayne or some shit like that
Jul 8th, 2009 #
Absolutely. The Threadless <3’s contests stay the line, I think.
Jul 8th, 2009 #
[...] part 1 / part 2 [...]
Jul 9th, 2009 #
It’s amazing to me what little respect is given to graphic artist. Illustration rates have pretty much been at a standstill for a looooong time now. This is just icing on the cake. The worst thing is there is always someone out there willing to do it!
Jul 9th, 2009 #
Absolutely. You’d think the gradual decline of the photography market taught illustrators to take a different path. Not so; we’re obviating ourselves.
Jul 14th, 2009 #
Yep, illustration AND graphic design are in a big heap of trouble, though most practitioners don’t acknowledge/realize it. Yet.
Businesses can use a Word template to make a pdf to send to the printer. They don’t need us for technical reasons so much anymore… and crowd surfing and clipart lessen our value even more.
Young designers and dabblers are likely the ones that we need to reach with this “no spec” message.
However, that doesn’t really effect overseas folks who’ll do work for $7.
It’s a tough thing to combat. No easy fixes.
Jul 14th, 2009 #
and then i go browse e-lance, where most of the art jobs are bid on…so now not only are we already in a field where our rates have not changed in over a decade, but now we are undercutting our worth and other artist’s worth by bidding on jobs and agreeing to far lower rates than are even livable for the work done…because of course, they are going to pick the lowest offer regardless of talent or skill. and then that guy is going to get seen and recommended and get more work. and this is why so much corporate or industry work is watered down tripe by someone with poor design skills but does it on the cheap.
after a time, the companies realize they do want edgy new visions, but then they come to us, see that we want the fair scale price, and go right back to johnny cut-n-paste. we shouldn’t be bidding on getting jobs. this is not construction where no matter who wins, they are all making the same building. if people see our work and want something about our style, THAT’s what they should be paying for. lowering our prices to get jobs does everyone harm.
sorry, i’m just pissed after browsing elance today..lol
Jul 14th, 2009 #
If freelance should die before i wake…
Perhaps the only way to go now is to join a good design firm (few and far between) or become an in-house graphic designer or somethin for a company.
Apple must have great graphic designers, for example, because all of their packaging, websites, etc., look legit.
Also, some people need to really diversify their portfolios. You’ll have trouble finding work from good clients if you only have art in one very specific style. Or try your style on different mediums. Show people how good it can look and how it can apply to their different needs.
Get extremely professional business cards with cool embellishments and get them around at the local level. Anytime someone needs help with any design or artwork you can give them your card and tell them to check out your portfolio. Freelancers also have the edge because they’re always at least a little bit cheaper than a big ass shitty design firm.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
This sounds like a lot of whinning, times are changing, and in a fast pace industry it is either adapt or be phased out. You have a very niche style, and as the person above me stated you need to diversify your portfolio. I still feel that for an illustration charging 400 dollars minimum is a bit high.
It is like the RIAA and MPAA, either embrace the new technologys or you’ll be left in the dust. Time to stop whinning and figure something out that’ll keep work comming in. I have hired 2 people off of Emptees and they worked out great, I would love to get work done by you if I didn’t think it would be outrageously expensive!
my .02 cents
.Zane
Jul 17th, 2009 #
Let’s examine the RIAA/illustrator example. You’re the RIAA in the situation. I’m the creative producing content. Bands (or, in this metaphor, me) should cut out the middleman who doesn’t value our work (you) and sell our music (art/tees/products) directly.
My prices are not outrageously expensive. $400 (I actually charge more) for a tee design is less than the Graphic Artist’s Guild Pricing and Ethical Standards guide suggested an illustrator charge two editions ago.
I assume you like feeding your family, no? So do I.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
I’m a firm believer in that you (should) get what you pay for. Unfortunately, it often seems clients will sacrifice quality to save a few bucks (which only exacerbates the issue of crowdsourcing). In my opinion, Ray’s work is worth every penny to a potential client; and likewise for most designers/illustrators that value their own time and effort.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
I love when people who have no idea the amount of time and effort that goes into an illustration/design tell you that you charge too much. That’s rich.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
Matt, the Penguin Science Fiction link on your blog is fantastic.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
Fair argument, saying we need to keep developing styles & new ideas for income. However, the idea that freelancers can live on skimpy-desperate-craigslist fees… well those people need to try living on that themselves. There aren’t enough hours in the week to line up the jobs necessary to pay the bills.
As for themed contests, they’re awful. Would a person work in an office all week on the chance they’ll “win” their pay at the end of the week? “Sorry, Bob won this week. Maybe next time!”
There are so many things done to artists that would never be tolerated in a salary job. But the main problem is too many artists are doing it to themselves and their peers. I know I’ve done it, when desperate. We make it possible and easy to get screwed. If the Zanes of the world couldn’t find artists who work for cheap, he’d either have to do without, or man up and pay the going rate. Most clients are not going to pay what’s fair. They’re going to pay what they can get away with.
I think what Ray is pissed off with, is that Cameesa is making it that much easier for artists to screw themselves over. Yeah, ultimately the artists are doing it to themselves, but that doesn’t make it okay to help them along that route.
Jul 17th, 2009 #
I’m still smarting from $400 (not even my pricing) being “outrageously expensive.” Give me a break; le sigh.