<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Rabbits Illustration Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=bad-rabbits-illustration-videos</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Ray Frenden, an illustrator.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: basil</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>basil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-767</guid>
		<description>I see, what pressure settings for brush tracking do you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, what pressure settings for brush tracking do you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Frenden</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Frenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-758</guid>
		<description>This was low res. Its final use is on screen. I say work as big as your machine can possibly stand, always, for anything print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was low res. Its final use is on screen. I say work as big as your machine can possibly stand, always, for anything print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basil</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>basil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-757</guid>
		<description>hey ray, i love the illustration, i watched the entire thing! what dpi do you work on again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey ray, i love the illustration, i watched the entire thing! what dpi do you work on again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Frenden</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Frenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had time for a personal piece in a while. It&#039;s a bit disheartening, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had time for a personal piece in a while. It&#8217;s a bit disheartening, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ameeee</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ameeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Cool thanks, I was just wondering if you had any aspirations to do stuff on paper - because as you said it&#039;s more efficient to go straight into the program for client work. I just meant for you personally.. but obviously with all the client work you probably don&#039;t have time. Thanks for answering though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool thanks, I was just wondering if you had any aspirations to do stuff on paper &#8211; because as you said it&#8217;s more efficient to go straight into the program for client work. I just meant for you personally.. but obviously with all the client work you probably don&#8217;t have time. Thanks for answering though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Frenden</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Frenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-746</guid>
		<description>I work much farther out than actual size. That would be pretty limiting. 

I have worked as high as 19,000 x 19,000 pixels, but tend to work around 10,000 now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work much farther out than actual size. That would be pretty limiting. </p>
<p>I have worked as high as 19,000 x 19,000 pixels, but tend to work around 10,000 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InLikeALion</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>InLikeALion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-745</guid>
		<description>So, you&#039;re saying you are often zoomed farther out than as you work?  I&#039;m just trying to get a sense of scale (or zoom scale) for what I&#039;ve seen you do.  

If I set up a brush like you did in the first PX post you did, and am still getting pixelated strokes, would you guess there is an obvious setting i&#039;m omitting, or perhaps my documents just weren&#039;t pixel-dense enough.  I believe I was working at 3 or 400 dpi, 8.5x11, which would have been 2,550x3,300 px or 3,400x4,000 px.  

That seems to be about .25 or .33 the size of document you use, if you meant you work at 10,000x10,000 px.  Am I understanding that correctly?  If so, and there is not missing setting, I guess that&#039;s my problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you&#8217;re saying you are often zoomed farther out than as you work?  I&#8217;m just trying to get a sense of scale (or zoom scale) for what I&#8217;ve seen you do.  </p>
<p>If I set up a brush like you did in the first PX post you did, and am still getting pixelated strokes, would you guess there is an obvious setting i&#8217;m omitting, or perhaps my documents just weren&#8217;t pixel-dense enough.  I believe I was working at 3 or 400 dpi, 8.5&#215;11, which would have been 2,550&#215;3,300 px or 3,400&#215;4,000 px.  </p>
<p>That seems to be about .25 or .33 the size of document you use, if you meant you work at 10,000&#215;10,000 px.  Am I understanding that correctly?  If so, and there is not missing setting, I guess that&#8217;s my problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Frenden</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Frenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-742</guid>
		<description>InLikeALion, I&#039;ve gotten a staggering amount of email lately that echoes your sentiments. It&#039;s pretty gosh-darn humbling to think that I&#039;ve inspired people to pick up their mark-making tools of choice and churn stuff out.

I don&#039;t work at 100% zoom constantly. I do a lot of panning and zooming. I find I can get good trace results from a 10,000 pixel file dimension as opposed to a 19,000+ pixel dimension, thanks to anti-aliasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>InLikeALion, I&#8217;ve gotten a staggering amount of email lately that echoes your sentiments. It&#8217;s pretty gosh-darn humbling to think that I&#8217;ve inspired people to pick up their mark-making tools of choice and churn stuff out.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t work at 100% zoom constantly. I do a lot of panning and zooming. I find I can get good trace results from a 10,000 pixel file dimension as opposed to a 19,000+ pixel dimension, thanks to anti-aliasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InLikeALion</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>InLikeALion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-741</guid>
		<description>One question I do have, is about anti aliasing and zooming.  On your video&#039;s, are you working at a 100% zoom?  And is anti-aliasing something Painter automatically does?  

There was a point in your initial PX video that you said you were able to work with smaller document sizes/less dense dpi in PX compared to MS, because of the anti aliasing. 

 I, however, end up with really pixelated looking strokes and that has been holding me back from inking.  Maybe this article of yours would be a good example of when bulleting out the hardware/software used/general document setup sizes would be beneficial to those of us just now learning.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question I do have, is about anti aliasing and zooming.  On your video&#8217;s, are you working at a 100% zoom?  And is anti-aliasing something Painter automatically does?  </p>
<p>There was a point in your initial PX video that you said you were able to work with smaller document sizes/less dense dpi in PX compared to MS, because of the anti aliasing. </p>
<p> I, however, end up with really pixelated looking strokes and that has been holding me back from inking.  Maybe this article of yours would be a good example of when bulleting out the hardware/software used/general document setup sizes would be beneficial to those of us just now learning.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InLikeALion</title>
		<link>http://frenden.com/bad-rabbits-illustration-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>InLikeALion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frenden.com/?p=116#comment-740</guid>
		<description>So, I see you&#039;re still using Painter X.  I wasn&#039;t sure if you&#039;re &quot;switching to&quot; article was more a practice in theory, but you would probably revert to MS.  I graduated with a BFA in art and did a lot of drawing, but never translated that into wacom digital drawing.  I gave it a half-hearted attempt a year ago, working in illustrator (didn&#039;t even launch Painter X, as I wasn&#039;t familiar with it), but couldn&#039;t translate the skills.  

All of my vector work has subsequently been done in illustrator with the good old pen tool and mouse.

Until I ran across your blog.  Now I&#039;ve explored Painter and my wacom a little, and it is really exciting.  I&#039;m still having trouble with my setup (I tried creating your brush settings from that initial Painter X post), but I&#039;m really excited about digital illustration and inking.  Thanks a lot for your contribution with your illustrations and videos.  

Seriously, i&#039;m actually EXCITED again about drawing, both digitally and with my &#039;daily&#039; sketch book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I see you&#8217;re still using Painter X.  I wasn&#8217;t sure if you&#8217;re &#8220;switching to&#8221; article was more a practice in theory, but you would probably revert to MS.  I graduated with a BFA in art and did a lot of drawing, but never translated that into wacom digital drawing.  I gave it a half-hearted attempt a year ago, working in illustrator (didn&#8217;t even launch Painter X, as I wasn&#8217;t familiar with it), but couldn&#8217;t translate the skills.  </p>
<p>All of my vector work has subsequently been done in illustrator with the good old pen tool and mouse.</p>
<p>Until I ran across your blog.  Now I&#8217;ve explored Painter and my wacom a little, and it is really exciting.  I&#8217;m still having trouble with my setup (I tried creating your brush settings from that initial Painter X post), but I&#8217;m really excited about digital illustration and inking.  Thanks a lot for your contribution with your illustrations and videos.  </p>
<p>Seriously, i&#8217;m actually EXCITED again about drawing, both digitally and with my &#8216;daily&#8217; sketch book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
